Skip to content

Conversation

@ivor11
Copy link
Contributor

@ivor11 ivor11 commented Dec 2, 2024

πŸ“‹ Description

add logging.file.name ci env

JIRA ID:
PSMRI/AMRIT#4

Please provide a summary of the change and the motivation behind it. Include relevant context and details.


βœ… Type of Change

  • 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which resolves an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • πŸ”₯ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • πŸ›  Refactor (change that is neither a fix nor a new feature)
  • βš™οΈ Config change (configuration file or build script updates)
  • πŸ“š Documentation (updates to docs or readme)
  • πŸ§ͺ Tests (adding new or updating existing tests)
  • 🎨 UI/UX (changes that affect the user interface)
  • πŸš€ Performance (improves performance)
  • 🧹 Chore (miscellaneous changes that don't modify src or test files)

ℹ️ Additional Information

Please describe how the changes were tested, and include any relevant screenshots, logs, or other information that provides additional context.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new configuration option for logging, allowing users to specify the logging file name through an environment variable.

This change enhances the flexibility of logging configurations without affecting existing functionalities.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new logging configuration entry in the common_ci.properties file, specifically defining the logging file name sourced from an environment variable. This addition enhances the configuration options for logging without impacting existing settings or functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/main/environment/common_ci.properties Added new entry: logging.file.name=@env.COMMON_API_LOGGING_FILE_NAME@

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits hop,
A new log entry makes our hearts stop.
With environment variables, oh what a sight,
Logging now shines, oh so bright!
Hopping through configs, we cheer with glee,
For every change brings joy, you see! πŸ‡βœ¨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ivor11 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review.

βŒ› How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5588602 and 5ac8479.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/main/environment/common_ci.properties (2)

139-140: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.

The configuration follows the established pattern and integrates well with the existing properties. However, consider adding a comment to document:

  • Expected format/path constraints for the log file name
  • Default value behavior if the environment variable is not set
 #ELK logging file name
+# Format: Absolute or relative path (e.g., /var/log/app.log or logs/app.log)
+# Default: If not set, logs to console
 logging.file.name=@env.COMMON_API_LOGGING_FILE_NAME@

139-140: Consider adding complementary logging configurations.

To ensure comprehensive logging setup, consider adding these common Spring Boot logging configurations:

 #ELK logging file name
 logging.file.name=@env.COMMON_API_LOGGING_FILE_NAME@
+
+# Log file rotation
+logging.logback.rollingpolicy.max-file-size=@env.COMMON_API_LOG_MAX_SIZE@
+logging.logback.rollingpolicy.max-history=@env.COMMON_API_LOG_MAX_HISTORY@
+
+# Log directory path (optional, if different from logging.file.name)
+logging.file.path=@env.COMMON_API_LOG_PATH@
πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5588602 and 5ac8479.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/environment/common_ci.properties (1 hunks)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (1)
src/main/environment/common_ci.properties (1)

139-140: Verify ELK stack integration configuration.

Let's ensure this logging configuration aligns with any existing ELK stack setup in the codebase.

βœ… Verification successful

ELK stack configuration is properly aligned with application logging setup

The logging configuration in common_ci.properties using logging.file.name property is consistent with the application's logging setup in application.properties. The main configuration file already uses the same property along with other logging configurations, and there are no direct ELK stack components (logstash, elasticsearch, kibana, filebeat) that require coordination. The parameterized value @env.COMMON_API_LOGGING_FILE_NAME@ in the CI environment properties follows the same pattern as the default logs/common-api.log in the main configuration.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other ELK-related configurations
echo "Searching for ELK-related configurations..."
rg -l "logstash|elasticsearch|kibana|filebeat|logging" --type properties

# Search for logging configuration in application.properties/yaml files
echo "Searching for existing logging configurations..."
rg "logging\.(file|path|pattern|level|config)" --type properties

Length of output: 415


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ELK and logging related configurations in all files
echo "Searching for ELK-related configurations..."
rg -l "logstash|elasticsearch|kibana|filebeat"

echo -e "\nSearching for logging file configurations..."
rg "logging\.file\.name|logging\.path|logging\.pattern|logging\.level|logging\.config"

echo -e "\nListing all properties files..."
fd ".*\.properties$"

Length of output: 1528

@drtechie drtechie merged commit 6e88dc6 into PSMRI:develop Dec 3, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants